ST. LOUIS BUSINESS JOURNAL April 26, 1999
Gallop in merger talks with Armstrong
Teasdale
By Rick Desloge
Gallop, Johnson & Neuman has had
preliminary talks with Armstrong Teasdale on a possible combination of the two
firms, according to those close to the law firms.
Gallop, Johnson and Armstrong Teasdale
walked down that same path in 1991 but called off their discussion after three
months. Since then, Alan Johnson, a chief rainmaker at Gallop Johnson, has
departed the firm. Johnson, One of the founding partners of Gallop, Johnson
& Neuman, took over as chairman and chief executive of Pauli Johnson Capital
& Research Inc. About four months ago.
Armstrong Teasdale is the third-largest law
firm in St. Louis, with 147 lawyers. It has a total of 201 lawyers, including
those in offices in Kansas City, Jefferson City and Washington, D.C.
The St. Louis Business Journal
ranked Armstrong Teasdale the region’s 148th largest private
business based on its 1998 estimated revenue of $47 million.
Gallop Johnson is the ninth-largest law
firm in the region, with 75 lawyers, all in its Clayton office.
Both firms represent a range of corporate
clients throughout the Midwest. Armstrong Teasdale, the older of the two firms,
dating from 1901, represents some of St. Louis’ larger corporations, including
Ameren Corp. And Anheuser Busch Cos. Inc. Gallop Johnson started in 1976 and has
built a stable of smaller entrepreneurial clients, including Falcon Products
Inc. and Data Research Associates Inc., as well as Anheuser-Busch spin-off, The
Earthgrains Co.
The Combination of the law firms would
create a 276-lawyer firm and bring a Clayton office to Armstrong Teasdale and a
downtown office to Gallop Johnson.
Individuals close to the firm, who spoke on
the condition that they not be identified, said it was the Gallop firm that
initiated the discussions. It was unclear whether the two firms were continuing
their conversations.
Neither Gallop Johnson’s chairman, Don
Gallop, nor Armstrong Teasdale’s chairman, Ken Teasdale, would discuss the
matter.
"We never comment on any proposed
discussions with other law firms or on any internal matters of pending lateral
(attorney) movement as a matter of policy," Teasdale said.
Gallop Johnson always referred questions
about the talks to Don Gallop, who said, "We don’t respond to
rumors."
When Gallop Johnson and Armstrong Teasdale
were in discussions in 1991, Armstrong Teasdale was still digesting its 1989
merger with a Kansas City law firm. At the time, managers of both law firms
acknowledged their cultural differences and openly wondered whether a larger
firm would serve clients better.
Since then, more law firms are merging.
Some have strong business reasons to combine, some follow the theory that law
firms have to be big to attract the big clients, said Tom Clay, a law firm
consultant with Altman Weil Inc. in Newtown, Pa. "It’s as hot and
vigorous a merger climate as it was in the 1980’s," he said.
The last big merger of two St. Louis firms
came in 1996 --- the former Thompson & Mitchell merged with Coburn &
Croft to create the 276-lawyer Thompson Coburn firm. Last year, Peper, Martin,
Jensen Maichel and Hetlage merged with Blackwell Sanders Matheny Weary &
Lombardi of Kansas City to create a 308-lawyer firm, Blackwell Sanders Peper
Martin.
One thing law firms learned from
the Thompson Coburn merger was local mergers produce a number of client
conflicts, said Aaron Williams, president of Aaron Consulting Inc., a nationwide
attorney recruiting firm that worked with the Blackwell and Peper firms on their
merger.
"Many firms of Gallop’s
size are entertaining, if not persuing, offers to merge. To remain competitive
at the top level of the St. Louis market requires a constant investment in
technology and efficiencies that come with hiring the highest caliber attorneys.
These things cost a lot of money," he said.
Williams said a Gallop
Johnson-Armstrong Teasdale merger makes more sense now than it did in 1991
because there has been a sufficient amount of turnover of partners at both firms
in the last eight years to create less resistance to change.